Without a valid legal basis . Employers may not send candidates friend requests or ask third parties for information about candidate networks. Only research on networks that serves to verify that the candidate meets certain qualities related to the position is considered valid. For example, in the case of a selection process for models, photographers or community managers, companies could investigate the social networks where they show their work.
But, not all jobs allow this type of searching to be done. For other jobs such as accountant or salesman, the reasons for researching the candidates' social networks would not be guaranteed. The right to digital privacy prevails . The particular case of linkedin likewise, it is important to analyze the whatsapp number list social network that the company accesses in these processes. Today there are social networks that serve to project our professional career, as is the case with linkedin , so if we appear in the search for a company through our linkedin profile, in any case the guarantees of the right to digital privacy .
This is lawful behavior. In the investigation of the candidate's profile in the rest of the social networks by the company there is no single rule to establish if the right to digital privacy is breached , but rather it would be necessary to study case by case and especially the relationship with the job offered.the entire operation of the internet is based on anti-corruption algorithms. This fact provokes the distrust of many users who do not fully understand how they work, neither artificial intelligence nor machine learning. The objective of anti-corruption algorithms, artificial intelligence and machine learning is to replicate the decision processes of the